Limitation of standardization: Understand why Bitcoin transaction weight rules restrict us
Bitcoin, one of the most recognized cryptocurrencies, was a pioneer in promoting decentralized financial systems. One of its main features is the possibility of performing transactions without relying on intermediaries such as banks or central authorities. To facilitate this, Bitcoin uses a consensus algorithm called work proof (POW) to secure and validate transactions. However, one of the most important limits of the rules of weight of Bitcoin transactions is their potential to restrict individual freedom and choice.
Standardization rules: a necessary evil?
In 2008, Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin, published a white paper describing the principles of the cryptocurrency network. A key aspect of the protocol was to normalize transactions, which guaranteed that all users had access to the same network and could interact with each other without problems related to payment methods or compatibility.
To reach this normalization, Bitcoin has implemented a rule called “standard rules”, which dictates the minimum amount required for a transaction to be considered valid. These rules are based on several factors, in particular:
- Transaction weight : The value of the transaction in the units of Satoshi (alias Satoshis) is defined as the unit of standard currency.
- Maximum number of confirmations : a certain number of transactions must be confirmed by the nodes of the network before a new block can be created.
Why the standardization rules limit the weight of the transaction
Standardization rules may seem reasonable at the beginning, but their implementation has led to several problems:
- Difficulty adjusting the weights : the minimum weight of the transaction is set at 0.0003 BTC (30 Satoshis), which means that users must spend a large amount of parts to perform a more valid transaction that this threshold.
- Reduction of transaction speeds : A higher minimum weight requires more computing power, leading to slowness of slower transactions and increased congestion of the network.
- The increased costs for minors
: Transaction costs are paid by Satoshis users (or other denominations) which are added to the total value of the transaction. Higher weights increase these costs, which makes them less attractive to users who wish to send smaller quantities of cryptocurrency.
Arguments to limit standardization rules
Some maintain that the standardization of transactions is necessary for:
- Simplified user experience : Users should not have to worry about different transaction values or network congestion.
- Increased adoption : standardized transactions can facilitate faster and more effective interactions between users.
However, these arguments are often based on an erroneous understanding of Bitcoin’s design:
- Limited flexibility : The standardization rules create a rigid framework that restricts the ability to adapt to changing market conditions or implement new payment methods.
- involuntary consequences : The emphasis on the standardization of transactions can lead to unforeseen consequences, such as a reduction in adoption and limited innovation opportunities.
Arguments against the limitation of standardization rules
Others argue that the limitation of standardization rules is necessary for:
- Preserve decentralization
: By maintaining a diversified range of transaction weights, users can choose the method that best suits their needs.
- Encourage competition : The possibility of sending smaller transactions or using alternative payment methods can promote competition and innovation in the Bitcoin ecosystem.
However, these arguments are based on a misunderstanding of the functioning of standardization rules:
1 and 1